[r1vver]

ok, two of my ideas:

1. To reduce the number of fake attacks.
Increase the amount of dappers that the attacking guild pays for the attack x100. In the case of q150 OP, it would be 400'000'000 dappers instead of 4'000'000. Or x1000 - then 4'000'000'000 dappers instead of 4'000'000. Even if dapper does not cost anything - this is more serious amount. And it's easy enough to implement for developers.

2. To solve the problem with inactive and weak guilds holding outposts.
Trial of Proof. To do this, once a month, the guild which is owns outpost should be able to withstand the attack of marauders of this outpost. Only members of the owning guild are defending, without any assistance of the community, alliances, other guilds, etc.
In order to exclude the possibility of a temporary move to this guild members from the other guilds to help - set the threshold of growth of the members-defenders in the guild by 6 members per mounth for example. 6 members increase per mounts - not so bad for for Atys today, i think.
If the guild loses a large number of members (6 members but now in 1 week) - at the end of this week - Trial, but now without that 6 lost members.

Or another variant - only a certain number of guild members-defenders will be able to click defend button and take part in the Trial. For outposts of different levels - different maximum number of defenders. But with rules of first variant (threshold of growth of the members-defenders in the guild per mounth).

In the weekend of Trial, nothing can interrupt trial (no OP-wars during Trial on this OP)

It's much harder to implement such thing but this is looks fair enough.