Quote:
|
Originally Posted by andypur1
Maybe there will now be 20 atys' years of discussions and committee meetings until a new version of clause I is produced mentioning those homin who have chosen to follow neither religion.  |
Of course
but if this is what Real Life politicians spend hours doing and get paid a gazilion bucks for it, why not?
Guess how many man/month can be spent on nitpicking one-liner clause or a simple clause in a license such as GPL
Don't forget the Karavan clause about PR has been discussed to death, justifying a mention during a live event.
"whatever religious persuasion (...) owe initial allegiance to one of the two official faith" , more or less
seems to imply (grossly) "whatever religious persuasion" -> whatever you may think of religion, and to me, includes non-religious, you should owe allegiance blah blah to Kami or Karavan.
Aaanyway... I think this is a nice excuse for another event
and get some IG event concerning Yrkanis Dexton etc so they officially state about Neutrality (whether it is widely accepted, applauded, tolerated, persecuted, banned, forbidden, etc., coverning all the meanings of neutrality). Citizens must question their politicians so they clearly state their position. In any way, my opinion stands, Dios speech seems to no adhere to the treaty, and no one really knows what he means by "Neutrals" (in my view, simply meaning unfactioned players)... but I wish we followed this path in a set of events.