[andypur1]

Originally Posted by iphdrunk

Of course but if this is what Real Life politicians spend hours doing and get paid a gazilion bucks for it, why not? Guess how many math/month can be spent on a one-liner clause , or a simple clause in a license such as GPL but "whatever religious persuasion (...) owe initial allegiance to one of the two official religions, more or less" seems to imply (grossly) "whatever religious persuasion" -> whatever you may think of religion, you should owe allegiance blah blah to Kami or Karavan.

Originally Posted by Tidings

I. All Homins of whatever race or religious persuasion owe initial allegiance to their Faith. Two Faiths are recognized;

But I read the 'initial allegiance' as meaning faith first, then race, not meaning everyone is either Kami or Karavan at the start. Our esteemed leaders only recognise two official faiths, but I don't think that the wording 'disallows' any other religious alignment; such homins just falling between the cracks in the wording. I do agree that it is a badly worded clause though

Damn, I'm starting to sound like a lawyer