It's a PvP poll not a flame thread o_o

[dakhound]

Originally Posted by mugendo

I have rarely been 'griefed' in any online game, and on the rare occasion it has happened it's brief and pointless which results in no harm done to either of us. And 'grief' has appeared in several forms....the 'dance of the three naked warriors' in WOW, The 'RP intimidation' of SWG, and the unwanted PvP Duel challenge of several games.
I read these forum posts and really wonder how many people actually recieve 'grief' ingame...and how many just 'dislike' an aspect of Ryzom ?
Just my curiosity...............

I have never been griefed even as an all out pvp player, I've been "ganked" and found it quite funny

[mugendo]

Originally Posted by dakhound

I have never been griefed even as an all out pvp player, I've been "ganked" and found it quite funny

I used the word grief as a reference to 'unwanted attention', and I'm the same view as you dakhound, I have never had my enjoyment of a game destroyed by another player.
I am getting tired of the requests to consider other people's feelings becoming demands to modify my actions and moderate my views...because it has the 'possibility' of upsetting someone I may never meet.
I will make this my last post on this subject today as I think my negative mood will not be appreciated here

[kyesmith]

Originally Posted by sprite

Oops, missed that one out completely

KA @ 15
Others @ 11
Neutral @ 2

Point still stands

Oh, and *hugs* to Nilleh

not exactly an acurate way of showing who owns what, the Q of outposts counts for alot more than amount, to make it fair add up the Q of the outposts kami own and the karavan allience own.

KA = 2800
Kami = 850
Karavan with morals = 350
neutrals = 800
total = 4800

the KA own 58.3% of the outposts on atys, do they account for that much of the population? If so the current system is fair

Statistically the most accurate way i can be bothered to show

[d29565]

Originally Posted by dakhound

first thing you erased was valid in my opinion, I prefer to say things directly and am happy to stand by it.

second thing was there as you labelled me as a flamer, so be it

Actually, I was complimenting you in my post. I called you a flamer earlier when you were, well, flaming Jy.

The parts I erased:

aye please close this thinly disguised whine thread!

and

and so yet another jackoba flame ends

took away from the truth of the words in between. I simply liked what you wrote and thought to mention it. I am sorry if that is considered a flame?!?

[rundll32]

Originally Posted by bgraz

that MUST mean that remaining 46% of OPs are easily and fully supplying the rest of the population of atys

Well if the KA alliance is as big as you make out, then surely 46% for the rest of the server sounds pretty generous.

Unless you're including all those who choose not to pvp in that comment, in which case, why should they expect to receive the benfits of pvp?

[totnkopf]

Originally Posted by m1nion

From what i have haerd it used to be the Kami in full control of the server before the balance swung around.

when was this? As long as I've played the game, the Kami were never in full control (or even close to it).... there was a time when the borders were held and battles were evenly matched, but thats a time long gone.

if your join date is actually accurate, you missed the closer-to-even server by a month or so.

I say it again... the Kami were never in control of the server. There was a time where we could hold our own, put up a good fight, and saw battles closer to even. But Kami dominance over the server was never a reality.

anyway, back to your flamefest.

[sprite]

Originally Posted by totnkopf

I say it again... the Kami were never in control of the server. There was a time where we could hold our own, put up a good fight, and saw battles closer to even. But Kami dominance over the server was never a reality.

Of course that also means there was a time when the Karavan were not in control of the server either (and therefore such a time could come again), but I'm not sure thats being contested

[wardone]

i would suggest actions like a KA guild invading kami lands to aquire their third op to perfectly explain the greed and arrogance of this alliance.


what more needs to be said actions speak much louder than words well some of us are sick of playing that tired old game so its back to digging for us.

[dakhound]

Originally Posted by wardone

i would suggest actions like a KA guild invading kami lands to aquire their third op to perfectly explain the greed and arrogance of this alliance..

aye real greed, hence they gave away their lower op's to worthy allies

[ajsuk]

yar, so what if they did anyway, I do believe OPs are supposed to be fought over.

If we're all supposed to have an equal amount why don't they just double xp across the board and magic some mats/flowers in to our GHs once in a while...